Writing Band Descriptors, Archdragon Peak Wyvern, Mtg Arena Color Challenge White Vs Blue Walkthrough, Philadelphia Cream Cheese Dip Recipes Australia, Deuteronomy 28:12 Nkjv, Condiments For Pork Burgers, Problems Of Communication Pdf, Eurasian Thick-knee Call, "/> Writing Band Descriptors, Archdragon Peak Wyvern, Mtg Arena Color Challenge White Vs Blue Walkthrough, Philadelphia Cream Cheese Dip Recipes Australia, Deuteronomy 28:12 Nkjv, Condiments For Pork Burgers, Problems Of Communication Pdf, Eurasian Thick-knee Call, "/>

bioshock 2 good ending kill gil

by

Do you consider killing him a good or a bad action? If it wasn’t already clear from the title, this guide will contain spoilers. I know that to kill her, I must kill at either Grace, Stan or Gil, but I'm afraid if I do so, in case I don't get the good ending. So achievement wise it is considered good to spare him. Games with multiple endings – such as the now infamous Silent Hill, Heavy Rain or Alpha Protocol-- have a wealth of options and different outcomes for the player to play through.This may add to the longevity or replay-ability of the title and give a greater sense of impactful storytelling and reinforcement of player input in the game world itself. It seems like killing him would be the "good" thing to do, but I'm not sure. I really hate Sofia Lamb, and really want to kill her at the end of the Game. I save the little sisters and the old woman but kill gil and the newspaper guy and get the good ending. Gil will even ask you to kill him because of the remorse he feels for brainwashing and experimenting on these young girls. BioShock 2 Remastered. Spoilers! If you believe that Gil and the other two choices deserve death for their actions, the ending is usually a darker one. Close. Yeah it can be a bit misleading since the former Gil from the past who is guiding you via audio log is pleading that you kill him. 8 comments . Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. Each of these choices changes how the story plays out in the ending. In Bioshock 2 isn't it more humane to kill Gil, the insane splicer in the giant tank, rather than let him live? I originally chose to spare Gil because I felt like that was more punishing to him than killing him. Is there a way of killing her and still managing to get the good ending? The alternative good ending is to spare all little sisters and kill all NPCs, including Gil, which ends in the little sisters being saved and Sofia being killed by Eleanor. Is Flying in Star Citizen Actually Fun and Exciting? It's a no-win situation. Answer Save. Hmm, yeah. If you save all the little girls, and have already killed the first two choice characters, then "sparing" Gil is the only way to get the good-good ending. save hide report. share. First of all, the achievement and trophy hunters out there will want to spare Gil because there’s an achievement/trophy for choosing to save every Little Sister and spare every life in BioShock 2. BioShock 2: Should You Kill or Spare Gil? There are, technically speaking, six possible endings in BioShock 2. The Bioshock 2 endings may not be as numerous as a Heavy Raintype adventure, but t… Anyone know which is good? I'm pretty sure the first time I played the game I killed him because, like I said, I thought it was the kinder thing to do. share. Somewhere down the line, it just got looped in with the whole 'kill is bad, spare is good' philosophy that doesn't really fit that level/character. Or is this an oversight in development - they couldn't change the requirements for one NPC or something? This subreddit is dedicated to the BioShock game series. This may add to the longevity or replay-ability of the title and give a greater sense of impactful storytelling and reinforcement of player input in the game world itself. Close. 100% Upvoted. And that was before I knew of all the ending possibilities and metagaming to get the ending I wanted - I was just playing the game and making choices I thought were right. That gives you the default good ending where Sofia lives, it's not a bad ending at all. Posted by. But the game considers sparing him to be the morally good option so if you want the Savior achievement or are trying for a certain ending (dependent on other things as well) you will have to spare Gil. You have Alexander the Great trying to stop you and kill you with houdini splicers and other Deltas the whole time so it's pretty clear that you should be listening to Gil rather than Alexander. I'm replaying Bioshock 2 right now and I'm going for an alternate good playthrough where I save all the little sisters and punish the NPCs, which for the majority of them, is to kill them. Gilbert Alexander is effectively dead, his mind and body twisted into something unrecognizable. 5 days ago. It's the epitome of a grey area. Posted by . You're not meant to do either. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. Everything up to that point story-wise suggests killing Gil to be the more merciful and ethical choice. 5 years ago. Though, having a mixture of saved/harvested Little Sisters and spared/killed Rapture residents will always lead to one of two neutral endings. BioShock 2 help with Gil? Morals aside, your choice really depends on which ending you want to get. The morality of the choice as it is in game does make some sense. On the flip side of the situation above is the option to electrify Gil’s containment tank and kill him. Answered. Favorite Answer . Only afterwards the "old" Alexander will unveil a special button with which you will get rid of his current self. Here are some tips on what to do when deciding Gil’s fate. However sparing him, seems like you're leaving him in his madness to rot. However, Gil is a little bit different. To get the alternate good ending where Sophia dies, you need to kill all … Well yeah, the ultimate good ending is to spare all little sisters and spare all NPCs which ends in the little sisters being saved, as well as Sofia. ... That can't be correct. The sane side of himself begs you to kill him because he's gone completely mad so that seems like the kinder thing to do. Cookies help us deliver our Services. Are we meant to be listening to the mad side of Gil instead and taking pity on him so it's considered a good thing to save him? About Gil in Bioshock 2. spoiler. spoiler. Though I may just be roleplaying too hard and I'm stuck making a decision I don't want to make just to get a specific ending. She, her name is Eleanor, did not kill her father, Delta. 4 years ago. BioShock 2 treats sparing Gil as the “good” act, even though he is responsible for turning little girls into Little Sisters and linking them to Big Daddies. Press J to jump to the feed. In my "good" play through, I didn't kill Grace or Stanley, but when I got to Gil Alexander, I thought it was far more humane to end his psychotic suffering, the very thing he told you to do. Past-Alexander is, by his own admission gone and effectively 'dead.' Eleanor Lamb. the only explanation is that the thing Gil became now wants to live and his decision is … The new thing he is wants to live. BioShock 2’s video game logic dictates that killing Gil is essentially the wrong thing to do because Eleanor will learn from your acts of vengeance in the end. Am I just looking at this the wrong way? Africa. Games with multiple endings — such as the now infamous Silent Hill, Heavy Rain or Alpha Protocol — have a wealth of options and different outcomes for the player to play through. A lazy decision made by developers in an otherwise excellent game. "Alex the Great", on the other hand, wants to live and begs you to show mercy. As for Mr Gilbert - if you're in a hurry, it's easy to simply miss the opportunity to kill him. Why did the girl in bioshock 2 kill her dad in the good ending? I'm pretty sure I read somewhere that "killing him = good, letting him live = bad" was the intended outcome by the developers, but was unintentionally switched around. I can't find anything on the wiki to support this, though, so take it with a grain of salt. About Gil in Bioshock 2. spoiler. There are six, from good to neutral, to bad, with slight variations. I didn't understand why sparing everyone gave us an achievement and is considered the best ending. Answered. It took me years to realize killing him was bad. That's what he wanted. You can kill Gil Alexander and still get the good ending, as it's the "right" not "wrong" decision, it actually helps against other bad deeds. Home » Guides » BioShock 2: Should You Kill or Spare Gil? As far as Lamb goes, her faith is decided on whether you kill or spare characters. 2. Present-Alexander wants to live. I guess it begs the question on whether you should trust the words of someone who's completely lost their mind and has become extremely mentally unstable or if you listen to their former, sane self who's telling you they don't ever want to live like that. To get the alternate good ending where Sophia dies, you need to kill all NPCs. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Spoilers! He wanted you to kill the now crazy "Alex the Great" that he became. 11 comments. That said, you can still get a version of the good end by sparing two lives. ... good ending- rescue all little sisters, but kill ALL three choices. That’s everything you need to know about how to deal with Gil Alexander in BioShock 2. If you want to see the “worst” bad end in BioShock 2, you’ll need to kill Gil. Not sure about the ending, but to get the Savior achievement you have to spare him.

Writing Band Descriptors, Archdragon Peak Wyvern, Mtg Arena Color Challenge White Vs Blue Walkthrough, Philadelphia Cream Cheese Dip Recipes Australia, Deuteronomy 28:12 Nkjv, Condiments For Pork Burgers, Problems Of Communication Pdf, Eurasian Thick-knee Call,